From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17656 invoked by alias); 27 May 2002 10:04:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 17648 invoked from network); 27 May 2002 10:04:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.222.13) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 May 2002 10:04:13 -0000 Received: from calypso.arrow ([80.5.195.102]) by mail1-gui.server.ntli.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-33929U70000L2S50) with ESMTP id AAA1197 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 11:04:10 +0100 Received: from localhost (stuart@localhost) by calypso.arrow (8.11.6/8.8.7) with ESMTP id g4RA3ux01757 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 11:04:02 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: calypso.arrow: stuart owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 07:03:00 -0000 From: Stuart Brady X-X-Sender: stuart@calypso.arrow To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mkcramfs under cygwin ?? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg01637.txt.bz2 On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, gmx wrote: > since i got no reply to my mkcramfs porting question Your mail is taking a very long time to get here, or your clock is wrong. Looking at the headers, I'd go with the latter. Those that sort by date could miss your mail completely. -- Stuart Brady -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/