Problems using 'mkdirhier'

Problems using 'mkdirhier'

[Angelo Graziosi]

Trying to build an application downloaded from the web, the make fails
using 'mkdirhier'. I have reproduced this with the following example:

As Administrator:
-------------------------------------
$ cd
$ mkdirhier /home/Administrator/foo1/foo2/lib
mkdir: cannot create directory `//home': No such host or network path
mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator': Permission denied
mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator/foo1': Permission
denied
mkdir: cannot create directory
`//home/Administrator/foo1/foo2': Permission denied
mkdir: cannot create directory
`//home/Administrator/foo1/foo2/lib': Permission denied

-------------------------------------

The system is W2K SP4 with ALL CYGWIN installed.

I am using the snapshot : 1.5.20s(0.155/4/2) 20060614 16:21:31

In cygwin am using the following test packages:


   coreutils-5.96-1
   emacs-21.3.50-2.*
   findutils-4.3.0-1
   lesstiff-0.94.4-1
   tar-1.15.90-1
   xorg-6.8.99.901-1.*


Cheers,

    Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Problems using 'mkdirhier'

[Igor Peshansky]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Angelo Graziosi wrote:

> Trying to build an application downloaded from the web, the make fails
> using 'mkdirhier'. I have reproduced this with the following example:
>
> As Administrator:
> -------------------------------------
> $ cd
> $ mkdirhier /home/Administrator/foo1/foo2/lib
> mkdir: cannot create directory `//home': No such host or network path
> mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator': Permission denied
> mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator/foo1': Permission denied
> mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator/foo1/foo2': Permission denied
> mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator/foo1/foo2/lib': Permission denied
> -------------------------------------
>
> The system is W2K SP4 with ALL CYGWIN installed.
> I am using the snapshot : 1.5.20s(0.155/4/2) 20060614 16:21:31
> In cygwin am using the following test packages:
>
>    coreutils-5.96-1
>    emacs-21.3.50-2.*
>    findutils-4.3.0-1
>    lesstiff-0.94.4-1
>    tar-1.15.90-1
>    xorg-6.8.99.901-1.*

Most of the above is irrelevant.  This sounds like a bug in mkdirhier, and
I also seem to recall that it was mentioned on the Cygwin lists before,
with proposed fixes.  Apparently, the fixes haven't been incorporated in
6.8.99.901-1.

Googling for "mkdirhier site:cygwin.com inurl:ml/cygwin" should turn up
the fixes you need.
HTH,
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Problems using 'mkdirhier'

[David Arnstein]

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:05:52PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> Most of the above is irrelevant.  This sounds like a bug in mkdirhier, and
> I also seem to recall that it was mentioned on the Cygwin lists before,
> with proposed fixes.  Apparently, the fixes haven't been incorporated in
> 6.8.99.901-1.

On my system, mkdirhier is just a shell script. The program "mkdir"
has an option "-p" that seems to do exactly what mkdirhier does.
Perhaps mkdirhier needs to be retired.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Problems using 'mkdirhier'

[Angelo Graziosi]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> 
> > Trying to build an application downloaded from the web, the make fails
> > using 'mkdirhier'. I have reproduced this with the following example:
> >
> > As Administrator:
> > -------------------------------------
> > $ cd
> > $ mkdirhier /home/Administrator/foo1/foo2/lib
> > mkdir: cannot create directory `//home': No such host or network path
> > mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator': Permission denied
> > mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator/foo1': Permission denied
> > mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator/foo1/foo2': Permission denied
> > mkdir: cannot create directory `//home/Administrator/foo1/foo2/lib': Permission denied
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> 
> .....
>
> Googling for "mkdirhier site:cygwin.com inurl:ml/cygwin" should turn up
> the fixes you need.

Applying the patch reported in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-06/msg00374.html seems to solve
the problem!

Thanks,
   
   Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Imagemagick / GraphicsMagick on a brand new install

[Angelo Graziosi]

Peter Pimley wrote:

> If I run ImageMagick's convert, mogrify or identify tools (and possibly
> others, I've not tried), they silently fail


As was observed (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-05/msg00034.html),
this seems to depend on new xorg*-6.8.99.901-1.

Perhaps you can use Netpbm, instead.


Cheers,

   Angelo.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot

[Angelo Graziosi]

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
> very close to what will show up as 1.5.21.  If there are no major
> regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.


Which Monday ?


Cheers,

   Angelo.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Jul 14 11:32, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> 
> 
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> > I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
> > very close to what will show up as 1.5.21.  If there are no major
> > regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.
> 
> 
> Which Monday ?

Well, Monday.  Isn't that explicit enough?  Do you also need the year?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Jul 14 11:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 14 11:32, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > 
> > > I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
> > > very close to what will show up as 1.5.21.  If there are no major
> > > regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.
> > 
> > 
> > Which Monday ?
> 
> Well, Monday.  Isn't that explicit enough?  Do you also need the year?


Just in case somebody's missing the smily:  :)


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot

[Larry Hall (Cygwin)]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 14 11:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul 14 11:32, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>>>
>>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
>>>> very close to what will show up as 1.5.21.  If there are no major
>>>> regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.
>>>
>>> Which Monday ?
>> Well, Monday.  Isn't that explicit enough?  Do you also need the year?
> 
> 
> Just in case somebody's missing the smily:  :)

Oh, I get it.  You're just being silly.  Well, if we can be serious for a
moment, I hope when this is released that you can make the changes available
retroactively.  I mean, think of the b20 users!

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot

[Angelo Graziosi]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> Well, Monday.  Isn't that explicit enough?  Do you also need the year?


The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was
dated 20060707.

Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html.


In any case thanks a lot,

   Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Jul 14 12:16, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> 
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > Well, Monday.  Isn't that explicit enough?  Do you also need the year?
> 
> 
> The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was
> dated 20060707.
> 
> Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html.

Actually, we're trying to get the DLL out as soon as possible.  But you
know what happens.  Every time we prepare a snapshot and really want to
get it done, somebody jumps up from behind a shrub and cries "Hey, I have
a totally new bug here!".  So, we're just not quite finshed.  Stay tuned.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:16:12PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>> Well, Monday.  Isn't that explicit enough?  Do you also need the year?
>
>
>The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was
>dated 20060707.
>
>Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html.

Or, maybe you could just assume that if cygwin wasn't released there might
be a reason?  Did you see any actual testing of the snapshot, for instance?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Failure to run image magic in the latest release

[Angelo Graziosi]

Andy Rushton wrote:

> Posting this report here with a work-around that fixes it gives those
> who use ImageMagick an insight into the problem as the response from
> Mark shows. If the post was useful, it was relevant.


Thanks a lots Andy for the work-around.

I posted (to the x-cygwin list) the problem some time ago, when I using
the xorg-x11-6.8.99.901-1 package as test. The only workaround I found was
to use netpbm instead.


Cheers,

   Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Updated [experimental]: tar-1.15.90-1

[Angelo Graziosi]

According to Eric Blake :

> In other words, to use this, you MUST install a
> recent cygwin snapshot (20060329 or later), or wait for cygwin-1.5.20 to
> be released. 


Cygwin 1.5.20 is out but tar-1.15.90-1 is yet in test section.

Are there special reasons for this to happen?


Cheers,

   Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Updated [experimental]: tar-1.15.90-1

[Eric Blake]

Angelo Graziosi <Angelo.Graziosi <at> roma1.infn.it> writes:
> 
> According to Eric Blake :

[Quit commandeering threads.  Because you changed the subject line of an 
unrelated thread, rather than replying to the correct email or starting a new 
thread, I had a hard time finding the thread containing your post in order to 
issue my response.]

> 
> > In other words, to use this, you MUST install a
> > recent cygwin snapshot (20060329 or later), or wait for cygwin-1.5.20 to
> > be released. 
> 
> Cygwin 1.5.20 is out but tar-1.15.90-1 is yet in test section.
> 
> Are there special reasons for this to happen?

Yes.  It is because cygwin is a volunteer project, and I have not had time to 
release tar-1.15.91 yet (yes, upstream has had a new release in the meantime).  
(I have been too busy getting coreutils-5.97, diffstat-1.42 and 1.43, m4-1.4.5, 
and xdelta-1.3.3 released; not to mention I also know that sharutils, 
findutils, and bash-completion all need updates; not to mention that bash-
3.2beta/readline-5.2beta is out, and I would like to play with that; and not to 
mention that bashdb is threatening a new upstream release this week.  About the 
only package I maintain that has not needed attention during the past month is 
cvsutils.)

If I may be permitted to make a hint - the cygwin donations page can be a great 
motivator.  If someone were to be willing to shift my focus via a donation, I 
would be willing to make their highest priority issue become my highest 
priority.  Not that I am hard up on cash (I do have a good day job, after all), 
but that it would be a better indication of where my efforts would be 
appreciated.  And this sentiment probably extends to more cygwin volunteers 
than just me.

-- 
Eric Blake
volunteer cygwin tar (and others) maintainer



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Updated [experimental]: tar-1.15.90-1

[Christopher Faylor]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:21:09PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>If I may be permitted to make a hint - the cygwin donations page can be a great 
>motivator.  If someone were to be willing to shift my focus via a donation, I 
>would be willing to make their highest priority issue become my highest 
>priority.  Not that I am hard up on cash (I do have a good day job, after all), 
>but that it would be a better indication of where my efforts would be 
>appreciated.  And this sentiment probably extends to more cygwin volunteers 
>than just me.

Yes, money is a great motivator but I wouldn't want people to think that
donating $10 with a comment that says "Please fix cron! It won't access
my network drives!" is going to have much effect.

Nevertheless, anyone who expects that they are owed anything just
because software is available to use needs a clue injection.  I'm not
referring to anyone in specific here but it does seem like the recent
climate in this list has been trending towards expectation of service
which does not match the fact that people like Eric are essentially
doing favors for anyone who uses the software they maintain.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/