From: Michael Hoffman <grouse@mail.utexas.edu>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Rick Richardson <rickr@mn.rr.com>
Subject: Re: A Simple Real World Benchmark for Cygwin
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 09:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0209021055250.144-100000@barbecueworld> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020902101958.A27819@mn.rr.com>
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Rick Richardson wrote:
> Certainly, some performance degradation under CygWin could be expected
> and tolerated. But not a factor of 30X or more. IMHO, of course.
No! We should not tolerate any performance degradation under Cygwin
WHATSOEVER. Cygwin should run faster than native Linux. Cygwin should run
faster than native Linux on a faster computer. Cygwin running on an aging
Windows 95 486 with automatic virus checking running should run faster
than a brand-new dual-processor Xeon system running on Linux. If the
developers stopped kicking dogs long enough to actually do some work, this
would already be a reality.
For a slightly more useful response, with slightly less sarcasm (but not
that much less :-]) check:
<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg02076.html>
--
Michael Hoffman <grouse@mail.utexas.edu>
The University of Texas at Austin
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-02 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-02 8:20 Rick Richardson
2002-09-02 8:36 ` Ville Herva
2002-09-02 8:55 ` A Simple Real World Benchmark for cygwin Christopher Faylor
2002-09-02 14:34 ` Dan Vasaru
2002-09-02 15:02 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-09-03 1:28 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-09-03 2:38 ` dvasaru
2002-09-03 4:52 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-09-03 4:59 ` Robert Collins
2002-09-03 5:42 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-09-03 9:05 ` Dan Vasaru
2002-09-03 23:34 ` Bjoern Kahl AG Resy
2002-09-04 1:55 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-09-04 2:10 ` Bjoern Kahl AG Resy
2002-09-04 2:22 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-09-04 14:44 ` BASH slow on network share scripts (was RE: A Simple Real World Benchmark for cygwin) Dan Vasaru
2002-09-04 20:07 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-09-02 9:06 ` Michael Hoffman [this message]
2002-09-02 11:37 ` A Simple Real World Benchmark for Cygwin Randall R Schulz
2002-09-02 21:31 ` Jeremy Hetzler
2002-09-03 10:58 ` Eric M. Monsler
2002-09-04 10:54 ` Shankar Unni
2002-09-05 17:50 ` Randall R Schulz
2002-09-02 9:51 John Vincent
2002-09-02 10:36 ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-09-03 9:08 A Simple Real World Benchmark for cygwin Robb, Sam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.WNT.4.44.0209021055250.144-100000@barbecueworld \
--to=grouse@mail.utexas.edu \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=rickr@mn.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).