From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=DXzT=6L=protonmail.com=w6b7rk5yu4mt25v3@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-4318.protonmail.ch (mail-4318.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.18])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4593858CDB
	for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:15:05 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DB4593858CDB
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=protonmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=protonmail.com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:14:53 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
	s=protonmail3; t=1676459702; x=1676718902;
	bh=vfSf/V9le+LsJPw95Lt/pwfo7d8/5b6Gt6Nk+kQyoVQ=;
	h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
	 Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
	 Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
	b=FmgAck95FGfruoSa+z/g5bHv8bnpP5wy5vtdQGIW/smpYXueYuD8vJ3dr6AMVghsM
	 FOzbJbBSatZDCqCcVaZT1gHw5rS/H/D/l5P/F/BwmEvdYAwirMdSPoArxwVKk5y1rH
	 xWKcDDKMTvHi2xIMccf70gb4paAG+Gg7+wb0470r0OfI06D+v1WXN+TFDaH3v9E5g8
	 eCZL9hUWZZYe3E7Vkw5vPTGQpm3nFFPhg1snJ23T6L5URYMt7a2kBbHElcWo8h9SBo
	 QNOpLn1Krhhh7ZwfnakvvzoZPAUJWYqtgB7qxOq1DqJoNKJA4HyYmBNvJttKx4vRK5
	 cm81KCZNcGE1Q==
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
From: w6b7rk5yu4mt25v3 <w6b7rk5yu4mt25v3@protonmail.com>
Subject: Fw: Re: Why do these mprotect always fail?
Message-ID: <TlepM9ESIu1ZpPCpz1vzmSoBKsKnuUABID2BREun8gb9tEPApKByf5s-_DHR9C6h48OdPFnU5uZ0Xc4JTTd-gtPH2RqhOHgOiSh-spI9K88=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y+y0zRQWVRWBkhCX@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <yxifinJpR7DQ4XDFwpYMrUknNpsg8wu5T1KYPeNIwjf3FL_lYou0whmzg-XCoFgYlcz96k0yEjkrxCOQOOTztnk_tvW7ZNi8_riHbsOn-ZU=@protonmail.com> <ruVqVpKyYTyh3m-4mzaAg2pyhJAqlamcbUYKB8ghh_LwAKIqpabv0LNqlt8_Owfzx0Hc6c1C6nJE4Czf4hod2ukAWe3b6p_WAaaGLPk7CI8=@protonmail.com> <Y+y0zRQWVRWBkhCX@calimero.vinschen.de>
Feedback-ID: 67221101:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>


PAGE_SIZE is just a naming conflict. If you change it to something else, JI=
T_PAGE_SIZE for example, it still fails. The problem is Cygwin is not fine =
with the particular value 4096 but the program needs the value to be exactl=
y 4096. About why I also sent to developer list, see:

https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-developers/2020-July/011913.html

https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2002-January/068158.html

This problem is well known at least.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
Date: On Wednesday, February 15th, 2023 at 17:32
Subject: Re: Why do these mprotect always fail?
To: cygwin@cygwin.com <cygwin@cygwin.com>
CC: w6b7rk5yu4mt25v3 <w6b7rk5yu4mt25v3@protonmail.com>


> cygwin-developers is for developers woking on Cygwin itself, not for
> developers using Cygwin to develop something else. I dropped the ML
> from the recipient list.
>=20
> And please don't top-post. Thanks.
>=20
> On Feb 15 09:43, w6b7rk5yu4mt25v3 via Cygwin wrote:
>=20
> > Almost forgot, PAGE_SIZE is set to 4096. This is a Linux application,
> > when I compile on Cygwin it complained that PAGE_SIZE is redefined but
> > the compilation was success nevertheless. Only when I run the
> > application, I always exited with "Unable to mprotect".
>=20
>=20
> PAGESIZE is 64K on Cygwin. If you change that, it breaks and you can
> keep the pieces.
>=20
> It would be nice to send a complete, self-contained STC() in plain C,
> so reproducing your issue is simple and doesn't require to rework
> your code to get a running, debuggable testcase.
>=20
>=20
> Corinna
>=20
>=20
> () https://cygwin.com/acronyms/#STC