From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F4AB3AA843E for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 15:32:46 +0000 (GMT) Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com Received: from calimero.vinschen.de ([24.134.7.25]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MHXWL-1p81r23YiP-00DUC1 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 16:32:45 +0100 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 75452A80A3A; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:32:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:32:45 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: gcc -pg broken after cygwin update? Message-ID: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:bsO/t0qGGfow94zXrQhA6EmH3cGZ0XIPUaAbVftxH7sRprDqFYD u+HEShM6vDbS6AOcgbNuym35muRr8gL/BGGSN8m/w2u5xPTomMacqJT/l4GtcL3b7oVkUbJ RlSOyMwzndoSJa4hyKSGsU9TXY5hc40gRY3uLjCwl+OYuFG2aImNmb5Y6GhIzhp/2LXmjWj 6xz0bjC/pxFXGxsM2Ck3w== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:oeMw4ZHuNSk=;xIA8OHuT/e/5ruSqzjXSvUuEtlf vzo+qH4pFQ7CRbGaF51EqR3nO7D9m/863FvhA64yUNlaBsxtR0MV2ZhANtBLX1PTpcTw7sKRQ yKuGNnoIY585P/6tLhVGaD/Ro5XWMh8hMj+/fahfw3wQDel+fxI58iwVTxFbFnNfdlQYkjgwR oHdfKsIYkr4/N0TLY8v8lBo1dbdBKCG2Yh+yXiZW5w7a+ZUEZF/i3Fmo7ITP0GNNU2FHOXGo3 +BVLIJZDSS3qtqxGRDT464q3NryJ86jK37zz0GaUDzKXCCv/69uJaeqVl3+RQur2Wym+YPxV4 y7Fd8cfNG/YQ6BPViLa0EB4DQJMYivCwgREsn2Q/atictwB2TnRqnwwIGUaCFvabZLgzIG/F6 O5LQDuXgLyB6xlnRs81HK25BcT4xU5DB2WxfEGha2bzbtfI3HQxrHJjgGcpFv2GJ092/491QQ ZWEds0DBDgNELlMvECNNZCdqZoIAr5Gcb/rt456satVvbTm1qF9AveG7P4+DoRoUqCdju+GVG +3hfmanJbA+fr0kd+Vv1ncTEifffNgk+K+C6ZA0oKrzbWNiuoB54UAUo5GAaFuiXTgwIJ6DHX bwyB0jglMTCiBBr+N4Zim249tFw8tMbsYd2F7TvJgGpUBC+GxjIB+zBVo7rtM+R6bevi7PouA neMAVDVdudRf+t4tKv33WgU4UnxZmvd2uOECq0xoNw== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Dec 8 14:47, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: > > for 3.5 (late 2023) we announced the deprecation of Windows 7 and 8 > > since the first 3.3.0 release in October 2021. > > I saw that. It did not look alarming. It basically was like "you'll be on your own". > > > Supporting older OSes requires to keep workarounds in the code and > > Understood. But you did not answer my question: > > > Are you saying that W7 and W8 would be actively rejected? > > and I meant by Cygwin? Not "rejected" as such. It just won't run correctly anymore on W7/8, because - the special treatment required for those OSes isn't in the DLL anymore, and - the DLL uses functions not available on these OSes. Corinna