From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 2155) id A74273858C50; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:18:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A74273858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1681723109; bh=oXVaUZAP4Bsoy2aJgtCZ4Em+pE6PNbQonAaNWv2QgCw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YDEm5zkce+KnvTbnSJcVyUz9pSvkAUaauTqO/H1xWrcD8mKPDasndqYQDI+iJpe6X yCsrz6R1a0vIvbyF/ERVgZQSDvImIXyWxCrT63GeQfHD8xRvkrcCThW3hsBEBLgVK1 lddFPEci5+fJFMdXgPyWAMijlJ/vTGCc4E4XjeyI= Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id BEC11A80B9C; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:18:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:18:27 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Bruno Haible Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: posix_spawn facility Message-ID: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: Bruno Haible , cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1752276.7aRn1RRit1@nimes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1752276.7aRn1RRit1@nimes> List-Id: Hi Bruno, On Apr 16 13:46, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote: > Hi, > > AFAIU, Cygwin has a working posix_spawn[p] implementation since 2020 > (commit 3fbfcd11fb09d5f47af3043ee47ec5c7d863d872, 2020-08-03, Cygwin 3.1.7). ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > [...] > Would it be possible to change Cygwin's posix_spawnp implementation, > so that both tests succeed? Basically, yes, but... > Disclaimer: I have done my tests with Cygwin 2.9.0; so, if things have ^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2017-09-07 I'm a bit puzzled. You quote that only Cygwin 3.1.7 has the fixed posix_spawn, but then you test this with a version three years older? Sorry, but... wouldn't it at least make sense to test this with a more recent version of Cygwin first? Thanks, Corinna