From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117322 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2016 23:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 117307 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jun 2016 23:35:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: limerock01.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock01.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.241) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:35:45 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id u5CNZhB6019547 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:35:43 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (mta-68-175-148-36.twcny.rr.com [68.175.148.36] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id u5CNZf9P021311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:35:42 -0400 Subject: Re: zp_fontconfig_cache_1.sh exit code 2 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: Ken Brown Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:42:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Cornell-Gauge: Gauge=XXXXX X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 On 6/12/2016 7:26 PM, Mark McGregor wrote: > ----Ken wrote: >> I obtained the output in the attachment, which looks good. Are you saying that the message is bogus and no action is needed? > > Yes. > ---- > > Ok, thanks! It is nice to know than nothing is broken in this respect. But it would be also nice to get less bogus messages. Agreed. I took a brief look at the fontconfig code at one point to see if I could figure out why this was happening, but I didn't succeed and didn't feel like spending a lot of time on it. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple