From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 42743 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2017 22:13:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 42730 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2017 22:13:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1593, Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA X-HELO: out4-smtp.messagingengine.com Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:13:47 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8521D20C61; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:13:45 -0500 X-ME-Sender: Received: from [192.168.1.102] (host86-179-113-49.range86-179.btcentralplus.com [86.179.113.49]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 12A49243F9; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:13:44 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: mksetupini fails validating packages because curr is test To: The Cygwin Mailing List References: <3e13ae03-786f-6157-00a3-53e909495751@dronecode.org.uk> Cc: Ivan Gagis From: Jon Turney Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:13:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00299.txt.bz2 On 29/11/2017 21:34, Ivan Gagis wrote: > What is that timestamp? Is it when the package was uploaded? Sorry, by timestamp, I just mean the mtime of the archive file. > Then it should not be possible, because lower version definitely was > uploaded earlier than higher version package. > > Where are those timestamps kept? Hint files does not contain any > timestamp and setup.ini only has its global timestamp, but not > per-package timestamps. > > Do you have any suggestion of how to fix this? Assuming you've found a bug, I need some more details to enable me to reproduce it, before I can fix it... > 2017-11-29 18:52 GMT+02:00 Jon Turney: >> On 29/11/2017 15:06, Ivan Gagis wrote: >>> >>> I have an overlay cygwin repo where I publish my packages. >>> >>> Recently I started getting errors from mksetupini script: >>> >>> " >>> mksetupini: package 'mypackage' version '0.4.38-1' is most recent >>> non-test version, but version '0.4.43-1' is curr: >>> mksetupini: package set has errors, not writing setup.ini >>> " >>> >>> there was no such errors before. And I don't have "test:" in any hint >>> files of my packages, so no I dea why it thinks that some versions are >>> non-test and curr is test? >> >> >> It's not saying any versions are test. >> >>> Can you explain what this actually means? >> >> >> "most recent" means "latest timestamp" >> >> So this is telling you that 0.4.38-1 is the non-test version which has the >> most recent timestamp, but 0.4.43-1 is curr: (because it's the highest >> non-test version) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple