From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90743 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2016 12:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 90720 invoked by uid 89); 21 Aug 2016 12:28:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=_is_, H*M:online, H*F:D*t-online.de X-HELO: mailout11.t-online.de Received: from mailout11.t-online.de (HELO mailout11.t-online.de) (194.25.134.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 12:28:43 +0000 Received: from fwd06.aul.t-online.de (fwd06.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.150]) by mailout11.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id E0BF042597FD for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:28:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.28] (VO4tCoZVZhlRHzJZvyJLUrJYeRZXaA8vToLFlT3hVIcLK4KAQpwptasGxDGTRETgmI@[91.59.5.29]) by fwd06.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1bbRrj-10MFdY0; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:28:39 +0200 Subject: Re: GIT source build failure: wcwidth.c::_wcwidth misses __locale_cjk_lang() To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <9cd85e4f-ac3a-cd76-71bf-445d7676a312@t-online.de> <20160821103028.n7via5q3t4xbusjx@calimero.vinschen.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:25:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160821103028.n7via5q3t4xbusjx@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00380.txt.bz2 Am 21.08.2016 um 12:30 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > thanks for the report, but I can't reproduce this. I can build Cygwin > fine natively as well as on Linux, with and without optimization. That's strange. On Re-examination, it builds here, too, even without the added include. I.e. effectively it took only a `touch` of wcwidth.c to fix this. Could there be a problem with the dependency handling in the newlib auto-foo which caused changes to header files to fail triggering a rebuild? And while I'm at it: what _is_ the dependency handling here, anyway? I can't seem to find any. Which could indeed explain the problem. > So why does this fail for you? I wonder if some compile time settings > are responsible for this problem. How do you build Cygwin from the git > repo? Do you use some special debug options or something like that? None that I'm aware of. The only differences in may sandbox prior to occurence of the failure were in winsup/doc Makefile.in and configure. Other than that it's a straight-up ../newlib-cygwin/configure --prefix=/home/hbbro/prg/cygwin/inst build. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple