From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-041.btinternet.com (mailomta18-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.24]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15939385800E for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:18:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 15939385800E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.6]) by sa-prd-fep-041.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20211210141847.SEFL30965.sa-prd-fep-041.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net> for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:18:47 +0000 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 613942900D666CB3 X-Originating-IP: [81.129.146.209] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.129.146.209 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrkedvgdeifecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffekiefgudejheetudeigfejledtleegleetkeduteeftdfffefhueefgfeutedtnecukfhppeekuddruddvledrudegiedrvddtleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddtfegnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduvdelrddugeeirddvtdelpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhdprhgtphhtthhopegthihgfihinhestgihghifihhnrdgtohhm X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.103] (81.129.146.209) by sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 613942900D666CB3 for cygwin@cygwin.com; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:18:47 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:18:12 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: Native ARM support for Cygwin Content-Language: en-GB To: The Cygwin Mailing List References: <1918386184.561539.1638929253143.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1918386184.561539.1638929253143@mail.yahoo.com> From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1192.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:18:49 -0000 On 08/12/2021 11:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 8 02:07, Aaron Franke via Cygwin wrote: >> Hello Cygwin, >> I am wondering what are the plans for adding support for native ARM64 >> Windows to Cygwin. >> Currently there are only downloads for x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit), >> but not for ARM. >> I do see in the FAQ that there is a mention of how ARM systems can run >> the x86 version of Cygwin, however I am interested in a native ARM64 That FAQ is out of date, since with a sufficiently recent Windows (Windows 11, I think), ARM also has x86_64 emulation (which should be preferred).