public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST: Cygwin 3.0.0-0.7
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 12:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b07e6ba2-0ce0-4662-7a02-bda6ce3b0108@ssi-schaefer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208122338.GN13951@calimero.vinschen.de>



On 2/8/19 1:23 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb  8 13:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Feb  8 12:51, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>>>
>>> For now it seems like there's an inconsistency with PIDs:
>>> A first process PID 100, receives PID 101 from spawn(),
>>> but in the new process getpid() returns 102:
>>>
>>> $ ./dospawn /bin/bash -c 'echo $$'
>>> 12625
>>> waitpid: pid 12624 status 0x0
>>
>> Oh, hmm.  If you call spawnve, rather than execve, a new child pid
>> is generated in spawnve, rather than just keeping the callers pid.
>>
>> However, apparently the child invents its own pid in pinfo::thisproc
>> after being spawned.  But actually this should only occur for forked
>> processes aore processes started from non-Cygwin parents.
> 
> Does that help, by any chance:
> 
> diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc b/winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc
> index 78506d43de29..0b274287d9f6 100644
> --- a/winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc
> +++ b/winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ child_info_spawn::handle_spawn ()
>        !DuplicateHandle (GetCurrentProcess (), moreinfo->myself_pinfo,
>  			GetCurrentProcess (), &h, 0,
>  			FALSE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS | DUPLICATE_CLOSE_SOURCE))
> -    h = NULL;
> +    h = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
>  
>    /* Setup our write end of the process pipe.  Clear the one in the structure.
>       The destructor should never be called for this but, it can't hurt to be
> diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/pinfo.cc b/winsup/cygwin/pinfo.cc
> index 445bd35b224e..d10c4fc4580c 100644
> --- a/winsup/cygwin/pinfo.cc
> +++ b/winsup/cygwin/pinfo.cc
> @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ pinfo::thisproc (HANDLE h)
>        cygheap->pid = create_cygwin_pid ();
>        flags |= PID_NEW;
>      }
> +  else if (h == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
> +    h = NULL;

No, because cygheap->pid still is the parent's pid here, not the new child's one.

How should the child be informed at all about the new cygpid value generated in
parent's child_info_spawn::worker() ?

/haubi/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-08 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-05 15:24 Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-07 16:14 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2019-02-07 18:27   ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08  6:46     ` Michael Haubenwallner
2019-02-08 11:32       ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 11:51         ` Michael Haubenwallner
2019-02-08 12:21           ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 12:23             ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 12:52               ` Michael Haubenwallner [this message]
2019-02-08 13:06                 ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 13:28                   ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 14:43                     ` Michael Haubenwallner
2019-02-08 14:49                       ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 16:18                         ` Michael Haubenwallner
2019-02-08 16:50                           ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 16:35                     ` Michael Haubenwallner
2019-02-08 16:58                       ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-08 17:00                         ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-02-11 11:50                           ` Michael Haubenwallner
2019-02-11 13:33                             ` Corinna Vinschen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b07e6ba2-0ce0-4662-7a02-bda6ce3b0108@ssi-schaefer.com \
    --to=michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).