* Re: gv became really slow?
@ 2009-02-05 13:48 Dan Tsafrir
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Tsafrir @ 2009-02-05 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
> I confirm that gv is practically unusable since I updated to x.org
> 7.4. It is very very slow. For the example you give, it takes only 2
> seconds to load (same version 3.6.5, Windows XP, Dual Core2 Duo 2.6
> GHz) but on the large ps files I use it takes ages to show compared to
> before I upgraded.
Yes. In fact, just doing page-up / page-down takes 3-4 seconds if the
page contains even the simplest figure (say, eps generated ny gnuplot,
plotting ~25 points). It's really frustrating :(
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gv became really slow?
@ 2009-02-05 11:25 Frédéric Bron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frédéric Bron @ 2009-02-05 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin, cygwin-xfree
> It used to be the case that opening a postscript file with gv on
> cygwin was more or less immediate. I've recently updated cygwin and
> now it takes about 2-5 seconds (a clock is displayed while gv is
> "thinking"). This happens even if the postscript file contains only a
> few words. For example, if you do:
>
> % echo hello > hello.txt
> % a2ps hello.txt -o hello.ps
> % gv hello.ps
>
> The gv version I have running is 3.6.5 (cygwin 1.5.25 on XP). I have
> no way of telling whether this is a cygwin problem or something else.
> But running the above example on a debian machine with a gv-3.6.5
> installed results in an immediate, much snappier, response.
>
> Is this just my problem? And if not, can something be done?
I confirm that gv is practically unusable since I updated to x.org
7.4. It is very very slow. For the example you give, it takes only 2
seconds to load (same version 3.6.5, Windows XP, Dual Core2 Duo 2.6
GHz) but on the large ps files I use it takes ages to show compared to
before I upgraded. This may be a problem of the X system so I forward
the email to the list.
Frédéric Bron
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gv became really slow?
2009-02-05 5:36 Dan Tsafrir
@ 2009-02-05 9:25 ` Dr. Volker Zell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dr. Volker Zell @ 2009-02-05 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
>>>>> Dan Tsafrir writes:
> Hi,
> It used to be the case that opening a postscript file with gv on
> cygwin was more or less immediate. I've recently updated cygwin and
> now it takes about 2-5 seconds (a clock is displayed while gv is
> "thinking"). This happens even if the postscript file contains only a
> few words. For example, if you do:
> % echo hello > hello.txt
> % a2ps hello.txt -o hello.ps
> % gv hello.ps
> The gv version I have running is 3.6.5 (cygwin 1.5.25 on XP). I have
> no way of telling whether this is a cygwin problem or something else.
> But running the above example on a debian machine with a gv-3.6.5
> installed results in an immediate, much snappier, response.
> Is this just my problem? And if not, can something be done?
I cannot confirm this behaviour. .
> Thanks,
> --Dan
Ciao
Volker
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* gv became really slow?
@ 2009-02-05 5:36 Dan Tsafrir
2009-02-05 9:25 ` Dr. Volker Zell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Tsafrir @ 2009-02-05 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hi,
It used to be the case that opening a postscript file with gv on
cygwin was more or less immediate. I've recently updated cygwin and
now it takes about 2-5 seconds (a clock is displayed while gv is
"thinking"). This happens even if the postscript file contains only a
few words. For example, if you do:
% echo hello > hello.txt
% a2ps hello.txt -o hello.ps
% gv hello.ps
The gv version I have running is 3.6.5 (cygwin 1.5.25 on XP). I have
no way of telling whether this is a cygwin problem or something else.
But running the above example on a debian machine with a gv-3.6.5
installed results in an immediate, much snappier, response.
Is this just my problem? And if not, can something be done?
Thanks,
--Dan
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-05 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-05 13:48 gv became really slow? Dan Tsafrir
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-05 11:25 Frédéric Bron
2009-02-05 5:36 Dan Tsafrir
2009-02-05 9:25 ` Dr. Volker Zell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).