From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83366 invoked by alias); 18 May 2017 21:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 83346 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2017 21:16:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EXECUTABLE_URI,KAM_EXEURI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Settings, contacting, morning, our X-HELO: out1-smtp.messagingengine.com Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 May 2017 21:15:59 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A614207D3; Thu, 18 May 2017 17:16:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 May 2017 17:16:01 -0400 X-ME-Sender: Received: from [192.168.1.102] (host86-166-190-52.range86-166.btcentralplus.com [86.166.190.52]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 335287E7A5; Thu, 18 May 2017 17:16:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: setup 2.878 only processes one site To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7d6dc5d3-e368-a513-d04b-58410da7152b@dronecode.org.uk> <157e3495-e031-0637-faf9-1d0813ece56d@dronecode.org.uk> <4e36141b-c287-35ea-39e0-227e4353c25c@dronecode.org.uk> Cc: David Rothenberger From: Jon Turney Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 21:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On 18/05/2017 18:04, David Rothenberger wrote: > Jon Turney wrote: >> On 17/05/2017 21:45, David Rothenberger wrote: >>> Jon Turney wrote: >>>> On 17/05/2017 18:06, David Rothenberger wrote: >>>>> Jon Turney wrote: >>>>>> On 17/05/17 00:14, David Rothenberger wrote: >>>>>>> When I use the new Direct Connection option in setup 2.878, it >>>>>>> appears >>>>>>> that setup only downloads the setup.xz file from one of the three >>>>>>> sites >>>>>>> I have selected. >>>>>> >>>>>> Something which might give this impression is that setup will now >>>>>> cache setup.xz, and only download it if it has changed. >>>>> >>>>> I think you nailed it. I tried again this morning and the first time I >>>>> ran setup, it did contact our local site, but it did not on subsequent >>>>> runs (even to see if the file has changed). I then modified our web >>>> >>>> This would be very bad, if true. Are you sure that we aren't >>>> contacting the server at all? (such requests might not be logged in >>>> some configurations) >>> >>> Yes, I'm sure. I verified our web server logs requests with the >>> If-Modified-Since header. Also, I used wireshark to confirm there was no >>> request at all to our web server. >> >> Hmm... In my testing I saw requests with If-Modified-Since: and >> If-None-Match: headers being sent and a 304 Not Modified response >> being sent. >> >> I added INTERNET_FLAG_RESYNCHRONIZE, which looks like it might be >> needed to do the right thing if the server doesn't send an ETag >> header, and made another build. > > My server does send the ETag header. I'm using Apache 2.4. Well, I still don't know what's going on, then. :) fwiw, I did some testing with an apache configured with 'FileETag None' and saw the the behaviour you described (doesn't even contact the server), so this flag is definitely needed. >> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.878-4-g582a35.x86.exe >> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.878-4-g582a35.x86_64.exe >> >> Perhaps you could try that and see if it improves things? > > The problem is indeed fixed with these builds. Thanks! Great. Thanks for testing. I'll do a 2.879 with those changes. And thank you for drawing attention to this problem. I looks like it's probably existed since forever in ""Use Internet Explorer Proxy Settings" mode. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple