From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
To: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Cc: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Subject: Re: Cygwin now on Python 3? What about Mercurial?
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:32:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b36b971e-e5a1-c5e9-40be-031158ea6b48@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb364670-8757-ce44-0197-d848d5ad9077@cornell.edu>
On 04.03.2021 16:19, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 3/4/2021 6:05 AM, marco atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:27 AM Russell VT via Cygwin wrote:
>>>
>>> Cygwin Enthusiasts!
>>>
>>> Well, I was going to hold back on this one, but having now watched
>>> the list
>>> for a bit, I think this is a fair question (feel free to smack me if I'm
>>> feeling too entitled, albeit maybe a bit on the rambling side).
>>>
>>> TLDR; Cygwin 64 Mercurial (5.5.1) blows chunks with default Python
>>> install.
>>> I'm still not sure if this is a package dependency error, given the
>>> recent
>>> Python 2.7 Deprecation "worldwide," or the way that Mercurial is
>>> packaged,
>>> or even if the package installation order on-down the line screwed me
>>> up at
>>> some point in the past.
>>>
>>> TLDR2; Am I really the "only" one on Cygwin still using Mercurial in a
>>> Complex Python Environment?
>>>
>>> Here;s my primary operating environment, devoid of whatever tricks I may
>>> try to play with Python Development environments (read: Path to /usr/bin
>>> with no funny stuff getting in the way)
>>> .
>>
>> Hi Russel,
>>
>> short term solution is the same mentioned here
>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin/2021-January/247657.html
>>
>> It seems the current package maintainer for Mercurial is not available
>> for
>> the upgrade from 2.7 to 3.8.
>> We need to decide how to proceed
>
> The Mercurial maintainer (Jari) doesn't always follow the mailing list.
> I've added him to the CC.
>
> Ken
Thanks Ken,
I already tried that route on Cygwin-apps
I am afraid he is out of reach, hoping nothing serious happened.
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2021-February/041088.html
REgards
Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-04 8:45 Russell VT
2021-03-04 11:05 ` marco atzeri
2021-03-04 15:19 ` Ken Brown
2021-03-04 18:32 ` Marco Atzeri [this message]
2021-03-06 14:45 ` Jari Aalto
2021-03-06 14:49 ` Marco Atzeri
2021-03-07 9:32 ` Russell VT
2021-03-07 11:58 ` Marco Atzeri
2021-04-02 13:27 ` Oleksandr Gavenko
2021-03-11 11:57 ` Jari Aalto
2021-03-04 13:30 ` Stephen John Smoogen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b36b971e-e5a1-c5e9-40be-031158ea6b48@gmail.com \
--to=marco.atzeri@gmail.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=jari.aalto@cante.net \
--cc=kbrown@cornell.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).