From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from m0.truegem.net (m0.truegem.net [69.55.228.47]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E840385841A for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:30:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0E840385841A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=maxrnd.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=maxrnd.com Received: (from daemon@localhost) by m0.truegem.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id 18LMUKr1079221 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:30:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@maxrnd.com) Received: from 162-235-43-67.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net(162.235.43.67), claiming to be "[192.168.1.100]" via SMTP by m0.truegem.net, id smtpdOlQbCR; Tue Sep 21 15:30:16 2021 Subject: Re: readshortcut (cygutils 1.4.16) fails with buffer overflow detected on windows 10 lnk files To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: Mark Geisert Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:30:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:30:23 -0000 Hi Keith, Keith Christian via Cygwin wrote: > Hello Cygwin Folks, > > Getting > *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated > when trying to read numerous .lnk files. > > Windows 10 Enterprise version is 21H1 OS Build 19043.1165 > Cygwin version is 3.2.0. > > Any info appreciated. I can reproduce this. I'll dig further and report back. ..mark