From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70887 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2019 19:44:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 70880 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2019 19:44:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*Ad:D*ca, contributions, HX-Languages-Length:1983 X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (HELO smtp-out-so.shaw.ca) (64.59.136.139) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:44:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([24.64.172.44]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id 7PaVi1asOIhW97PaWi2PIE; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:44:37 -0600 Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca Subject: Re: Command line processing in dcrt0.cc does not match Microsoft parsing rules To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <135817606.20190906233445@yandex.ru> <20190909182654.GA12686@dimstar.local.net> From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190909182654.GA12686@dimstar.local.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 On 2019-09-09 12:26, Duncan Roe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:57:21AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 9/9/19 11:47 AM, Stephen Provine via cygwin wrote: >>> Argh, my mistake about top posting again. My email client does not help me >>> with this by default and I have to manually construct quoting of previous >>> responses and delete what shouldn't be there (and missed it again). If there's >>> any way for someone to delete my previous message from the archive, please do. >>> >>> Why doesn't Cygwin utilize Github or something else more modern to manage issues? >> >> Just because it is "modern" does not necessarily make it better. >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.en.html >> >> ranks github as worse than gitlab, in part because there is no way to >> use the full power of github without surrendering to the use of non-free >> software. And it's now owned by a proprietary vendor without any roots in open source. > No problems with that. I think though, that the OP's point was to use *git* > (wherever the repo may be). The core code repo is in git on sourceware.org alias cygwin.com: https://cygwin.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git The patch and commit messages, and ChangeLog and NEWS files often contain references to the OPs reporting problems. There are no issue or bug handling components for git. There are bugzillas that have been write-only since about 2012: https://cygwin.com/bugzilla/describecomponents.cgi?product=cygwin if you report there just remember to email this list with a link to the bug. There is also savannah.nongnu.org which might be usable, as most non-GPL/AGPL/LGPL contributions, are BSD licensed to allow modification for proprietary uses. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple