From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 89266 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2017 12:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 89250 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jul 2017 12:20:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=houder, Houder, H*i:sk:cf8e7cb, H*f:sk:cf8e7cb X-HELO: limerock03.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock03.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock03.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.243) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:20:12 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite3.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.8]) by limerock03.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id v63CKAm8017143 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:20:10 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (mta-68-175-129-7.twcny.rr.com [68.175.129.7] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id v63CK8EH024812 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:20:09 -0400 Subject: Re: info: x86: prev@6.1-2, x86_64: prev@6.3-1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: Ken Brown Message-ID: Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Cornell-Gauge: Gauge=XXXXX X-PMX-CORNELL-AUTH-RESULTS: dkim-out=none; X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 On 7/3/2017 4:23 AM, Houder wrote: > Ken, > > Noticed a difference where I did not expect one ... > > Oversight OR on purpose? > > prev of info in x86 is at 6.1-2, while it is at 6.3-1 in x86_64 I have no idea how that happened, but it should be fixed now. (It will take an hour or so for the fix to reach the mirrors.) Thanks for the report. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple