From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D663858004 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:21:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B4D663858004 Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id 6so7916777ejz.5 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:21:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JJTlMinrqCrX+i+iPJXXq+aL5yQFcaYBwMuKnKrowwQ=; b=ntn0dVWoyjAWR9qVf2P4eqlzetbEW8U3E0B4C1R1Mxta/P16RuQHKakTLY7Dwej21/ XjOswXhelLBoe2ndq0vWASSKyH6GW4qPZPWgpz/T/kXhFGpXaXFfDYe7aN06hTIP6iye fvns5efFg9gG/RJKAZHTrsN/uHcUrPaZuIzaq+cap6hzvbW/rgwk9iwKB1MDaudKRjwz mZYSZPeSGBgxDCe/0S5ejxli9P1OMwx+s331vEBX6chBJcaoxetuamrG04CNADMSd281 kFX62FRqh3Mk+NX7HZZgXt4JKLxy+rHYlH89tmak9UA99La10LhrTiC1ClrbCE7gxK7B GUKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53327ZnAYNe9YUEZb4jyB9EwiFCWuAhVLyETfX53sMByhRn91ym4 Qw0rns0+Sej3iteJ6YtqvOx3iuYSTtQ723Me X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8CiHiFtN4J0r+9esNqEx3OEvjBc+Bz6Q2/vBrpfPaSsyqAVs1xCOZ+oCF2qd0nJMZ7kyBxg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fa82:: with SMTP id lt2mr9356474ejb.322.1608402103861; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (p5dda1f06.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.218.31.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b14sm21241655edu.3.2020.12.19.10.21.43 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:21:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: New version of GLM package? From: Marco Atzeri To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <952b6ef0-9d45-a53b-90b5-af03b0457c43@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:21:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <952b6ef0-9d45-a53b-90b5-af03b0457c43@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:21:46 -0000 On 17.12.2020 15:13, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 17.12.2020 14:19, Carlo B. via Cygwin wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> I'm wondering if it would be possible to release a newer version of >> this package and also fixing this bug if it is possible: >> >> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2020-August/245945.html >> >> Thank you very much for your time and your support. >> Sincerely. > > > > I will give a look > > Regards > Marco > for what I can see upstream has completely removed the install section from the cmake files on 0.9.9.8 . unclear why they performed such issue. I am reluctant to re-add that portion, without understanding the scope Marco