From: Eliot Moss <moss@cs.umass.edu>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: posix_spawn_file_actions_add[f]chdir_np
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:33:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca05e9c7-fd8e-0bed-336c-e28c31ea0b27@cs.umass.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZEA9Z+c64vxuvlC2@calimero.vinschen.de>
A wondering in all this ...
Does having more spawn support imply that bash (for example)
may end up doing faster process spawning, skipping some of
high overhead we've lived with for a long time because of
the Windows process spawning model?
Regards - Eliot Moss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-16 11:46 posix_spawn facility Bruno Haible
2023-04-17 9:18 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-17 18:44 ` Bruno Haible
2023-04-18 9:25 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-18 20:49 ` Eric Blake
2023-04-18 21:00 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-18 22:10 ` Bruno Haible
2023-04-19 2:39 ` Eric Blake
2023-04-19 8:19 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-19 11:56 ` Bruno Haible
2023-04-20 6:52 ` Csaba Raduly
2023-07-31 18:58 ` Eric Blake
2023-07-31 19:12 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-19 8:24 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-19 11:24 ` posix_spawn_file_actions_add[f]chdir_np Bruno Haible
2023-04-19 15:05 ` posix_spawn_file_actions_add[f]chdir_np Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-19 19:13 ` posix_spawn_file_actions_add[f]chdir_np Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-19 21:33 ` Eliot Moss [this message]
2023-04-20 10:27 ` posix_spawn_file_actions_add[f]chdir_np Bruno Haible
2023-04-19 10:48 ` posix_spawn facility Bruno Haible
2023-04-20 7:14 ` gs-cygwin.com
2023-04-20 8:35 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-20 10:18 ` Bruno Haible
2023-04-20 14:21 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-20 14:40 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-20 14:58 ` Bruno Haible
2023-04-20 15:40 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-04-20 18:46 ` gs-cygwin.com
2023-04-20 18:40 ` gs-cygwin.com
2023-04-20 19:31 ` Bruno Haible
2023-04-20 20:00 ` gs-cygwin.com
2023-05-10 9:15 ` gs-cygwin.com
2023-04-20 18:04 ` gs-cygwin.com
2023-05-10 8:59 ` gs-cygwin.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca05e9c7-fd8e-0bed-336c-e28c31ea0b27@cs.umass.edu \
--to=moss@cs.umass.edu \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).