From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105983 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2018 20:24:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 96340 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2018 20:24:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 spammy=paid, our X-HELO: mail-wm0-f51.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 20:24:07 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id o13-v6so7311154wmf.4 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 13:24:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XMBUu91hCnknWZd/lo631jcCZwwivTfP97IA0ZRl5z0=; b=qumBypTx0nabq2GiSFn0Q3Z40Pc6lMsaUiA/rrXh8vQ00x8ITGbRKNnHIK7DtC2O3E +Z2aQ0re/D1E5CEV2C43UAk277832Uy+e5eAuuDOlkr9T1OCG8YF8EGYNm/0Zam9Ni0Y 7tFz/cUo5kKLvWDRUy9Gfc8zoiOZdl/nDSmm3gkJDgivoWOrHLOVFwrpVvs7ouwxntPi y1rU6QI8i2wnVZ9rk7yT8lclcGXXO+hCnj10wUxfzGpxLoyARoKCAvxnhl1RTymheHoZ XN1Zk4edHsAePWlrYl7w1Q7JOzeLVh+UMJZ+uTK30KZu9A2hmDDwteVjnj2rfYfsX6Zf Z7vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2AFPHJ0q/Az33oltoKOL08SZj8qWfe6XDt1/EqmcczcB7ver8I YhoUhwL32f5MwoS/2dtVxUpucv1p X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLzUw40ZkpdttpcRIcLsphBCJxTRI/NZCOfCM96rp8PSnvDtVrqPERR9yt9CktXFH5mncnnZg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f0f:: with SMTP id 15-v6mr351764wmp.141.1528230245522; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.49.27] ([217.111.53.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h71-v6sm3379913wme.47.2018.06.05.13.24.04 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jun 2018 13:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Cygwin X11 Server slow performance To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <5d579671-213c-c742-05b2-b771a827b6f5@cygwin.com> <5B15D849.60308@tlinx.org> <5B16B381.7010205@tlinx.org> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 20:24:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On 6/5/2018 6:19 PM, Paul Sheer wrote: > 20 years ago Linux cult members were using the same > "blame-the-user"-type arguments. > > Nothing has changed. Please refrain from rants. You paid us nothing and we support you on our free time > > I don't need to do ANY analysis or tests to see that the Cygwin and > Mingw X Servers have abhorrent latency problems: you press a key and > you wait 0.25 seconds for the page to render. That's like the speed > of a page render over 9600 baud terminal. X Servers were NEVER this > slow even in the 1990s. We told you we don't have such problem on our machines. So something is peculiar on your own Please follow https://cygwin.com/problems.html and provide the cygcheck.out Please also check if you have any programs reported on https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.using.bloda or anything similar installed on your own computer Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple