From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7111 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2017 15:18:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 7098 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2017 15:18:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:86o9xpf, H*MI:sk:86o9xpf, H*f:sk:86o9xpf X-HELO: mail-wm0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:18:24 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id t18so14624247wmt.0 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:18:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SfLcjA09JSrwvaa2ht7Fq0qYxipcAveCdcLy6KfkNxM=; b=ir7c2mpNGMDLP5MAZkwMy2gZ6v8VJL8Ta/3ku4rbfhTcVybScEaKXjHiVsQC41Yr/j YFZDiJtES9t568122vslZDN3V/JcJiczPTep3CwOJwMWhocei7zNsuiI7CvKsOrfcod2 k2EyV3hjOvm0AsKguBfMs/iQZEbEzmXWsQb0N+pNEJb/TGEkzAMZ+Lffszyc/rZ6Y4X+ 3EVlKNp7JCKRCz8Gb0lkH8el7ItBGHW5DTF/DIKNVBF5PZO0+wYwFT1UZa3CJCz19w71 9CdWPlJrq5tz9YdkBFwPX5gMOKnpusR9EWXV7/FSlpIIAKv0olPbJhLG1m0tJWg/xZdI EkYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mW6OrVOCUAFfXu3NODWPNK0V/vxPzpdhr4a/xufU2+7ecwaSP1990M6PZjKyCflA== X-Received: by 10.28.20.144 with SMTP id 138mr9575123wmu.41.1488122302142; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (p4FDB3C06.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.219.60.6]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t195sm667442wmt.22.2017.02.26.07.18.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:18:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Updated: hwloc 1.11.6-1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <86tw7h7wmn.fsf@gmail.com> <9edce559-2813-c442-29e5-40154283981a@gmail.com> <86poi5z48t.fsf@gmail.com> <370c1b83-8c55-b0eb-14d0-be5721ec7ff6@gmail.com> <86o9xpf1b6.fsf@gmail.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86o9xpf1b6.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 On 26/02/2017 15:56, Andy Moreton wrote: > On Sun 26 Feb 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >> On 26/02/2017 10:32, Andy Moreton wrote: >>> On Sun 26 Feb 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>> >>>> On 25/02/2017 23:07, Andy Moreton wrote: >>>>> On Sat 25 Feb 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Version 1.11.6-1 of packages >>>>>> >>>>>> hwloc >>>>>> libhwloc-devel >>>>>> libhwloc5 >>>>>> >>>>>> are available in the Cygwin distribution: >>>>> >>>>> This appears not to contain the hwloc(7) man page, mentioned in >>>>> lstopo(1). Can this be added ? >>>>> >> >> it is in the libhwloc-devel package > > Thanks - I should have read your previous post more carefully. Note that > lstopo(1) says: > > Note that hwloc(7) provides a detailed explanation of the hwloc system; > it should be read before reading this man page > > Given this, would it make more sense to package hwloc(7) in hwloc rather > than hwloc-devel ? > > AndyM > next build I will move it. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple