From: "Tim Prince via cygwin" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Strange errors running gcc tests on Cygwin
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0d8542e-d2c3-e2c4-e807-e740bd3a2979@aol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53efff58-2f84-123a-95a4-a7c426c003ce@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
On 3/9/2017 6:51 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2017-03-09 15:53, Daniel Santos wrote:
>
>>> If you are running a lot of Cygwin services, cron or Scheduled Tasks,
>>> and/or background processes, you may want to look at running cygserver
>>> to cache process info and common system info (including SAM/AD).
>> I'm only running sshd -- no cron or "at" jobs (except whatever
>> Windows installs by its self). However, gcc's make check spawns a LOT
>> of processes.
> Which was why I suggested it.
Even on linux, I don't find it satisfactory to run make check without
limiting processes to number of cores. On cygwin and wsl, make check
seems to run into deadlocks or at least disastrous timeouts when running
multiple processes. With a single process, cygwin runs it more reliably
than wsl does. Conversely, sometimes (rarely) wsl can run make check-c
and make check-fortran simultaneously.
So it takes typically 2 full days to build and make check on cygwin.
--
Tim Prince
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-10 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-04 5:44 Daniel Santos
2017-03-04 11:27 ` Tim Prince via cygwin
2017-03-05 2:49 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-05 3:49 ` JonY
2017-03-05 4:20 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-05 7:23 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-05 7:32 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-05 11:08 ` David Billinghurst
2017-03-07 1:59 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-07 13:58 ` cyg Simple
2017-03-07 23:21 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-08 0:36 ` David Billinghurst
2017-03-08 5:14 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-08 8:21 ` Brian Inglis
2017-03-09 22:48 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-09 23:51 ` Brian Inglis
2017-03-10 0:01 ` Tim Prince via cygwin [this message]
2017-03-10 18:56 ` Achim Gratz
2017-03-10 20:30 ` Brian Inglis
2017-03-10 20:48 ` Achim Gratz
2017-03-13 16:35 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-13 17:25 ` Marco Atzeri
2017-03-15 16:50 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-15 19:36 ` Brian Inglis
2017-03-16 20:55 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-17 5:17 ` Brian Inglis
2017-03-18 13:48 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-18 14:52 ` cyg Simple
2017-03-12 4:04 ` Daniel Santos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0d8542e-d2c3-e2c4-e807-e740bd3a2979@aol.com \
--to=cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=tprince@computer.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).