Re: antrun versus wsl versus cygwin

[Houder <houder@xs4all.nl>]

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:39:11, Franz Fehringer  wrote:
> Am 18.02.2019 um 14:07 schrieb Houder:
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:15:02, Franz Fehringer  wrote:
[snip]

> >> <exec executable="C:\Tools\Cygwin\bin\which" failonerror="true">
> >>   <arg line="bash" />
> >> </exec>
> >> <exec executable="bash" failonerror="true">
> >>   <arg line="-c src/main/resources/build" />
> >> </exec>
> >>
> >> gives
> >>
> >> [exec] /usr/bin/bash
> >> [exec] W i n d o w s   S u b s y s t e m   f o r   L i n u x   h a s   n
> >> o   i n s t a l l e d   d i s t r i b u ti o n s .
> >> [exec]    D i s t r i b u t i o n s   c a n   b e   i n s t a l l e d
> >> b y   v i s i t i n g   t h e   M i c r o s o f t   S t o r e :
> >> [exec]    h t t p s : / / a k a . m s / w s l s t o r e
[snip]

> > I have no idea what "build" is or does ...
> > 
> > Apparently, it refers in some way to the WSL executables ...
[snip]

> build is some simple script which does not in any way refer to wsl. The
> result woould be the same without (i will check in the evening).

build is a script ?

Drop the "-c" argument. Use "bash script" in stead in your antrun script,
like you would on the bash command line:

$ bash script

Henri


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple