public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Farance <frank@farance.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: My delayed complaint about spam on this list
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc60851c-b32c-cf6f-6ae0-0bbadf430818@farance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b1724fa.1c69fb81.e68c1.159b@mx.google.com>

On 2018-06-05 20:04, Steven Penny wrote:
> [...]
> If OP is suggesting people can only reply if they are subscribed, then I am not a fan of that.

No, I'm not suggesting that one must be subscribed, I'm pointing out that if one wants to have a back and forth discussion (in a practical sense), some kinda registration/subscription system is necessary.  What I like about the present format of this list is: it's just E-mail, there aren't bulletin board web interfaces to forces the fragmentation of the discussion into separate threads, with cygwin I can see the discussion threads based upon Subject line.

Someone suggested a moderator (or multiple moderators) that would approve messages from outsiders.  That sounds like the easiest approach because it anyone can write to the list and there would be just a short delay for those people who aren't subscribers, but the main benefit would be the lack of spam.

I'm not tied to any technology, and I'm happy to have heard some more discussion, which better informed me about some of the Use Cases I was unaware of.

So here's my question (and it assumes that there would be volunteer(s) to moderate):

Question: "Would a moderation system work where subscribers could send messages directly, but non-subscribers would need a moderator to approve the message?"

If that is acceptable, then the next step would be to find a couple volunteers.

Your thoughts?

-FF

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-06  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-04 16:24 Confirm your subscription Kunal Ghosh
2018-06-04 19:31 ` My delayed complaint about spam on this list Frank Farance
2018-06-04 19:47   ` James Darnley
2018-06-04 20:13     ` Frank Farance
2018-06-04 20:27       ` Jeffrey Altman
2018-06-04 21:55         ` Duncan Roe
2018-06-05 12:26           ` cyg Simple
2018-06-05 17:38       ` Erik Soderquist
2018-06-06  0:04         ` Steven Penny
2018-06-06  0:18           ` Frank Farance [this message]
2018-06-06  1:01             ` Steven Penny
2018-06-06 15:50               ` Andrey Repin
2018-06-06 11:42             ` Eric Blake
2018-06-04 20:21   ` Vince Rice

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc60851c-b32c-cf6f-6ae0-0bbadf430818@farance.com \
    --to=frank@farance.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).