From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15454 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2017 17:10:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 15149 invoked by uid 89); 5 Apr 2017 17:10:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Exactly, hardship, bold, PKG_NAMES X-HELO: mail-it0-f53.google.com Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-it0-f53.google.com) (209.85.214.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:10:38 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y18so86917836itc.0 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:10:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eJGWn0S7fLmGgTH4RV1F9asFy8Dz3m0IAWhRxUk3I7U=; b=K48wQ1yIQLUoQIqs5diCNMbUQUgX1aKLLgDHnjI/UatzJRtUUs4neezZ6DTqKEzamZ I8X8m9tFtEK1spXUVxOw/gml917+nb7g1qAQ8HHU8m/NO/5sUN6gxWUAj/6Md8mqge7Z c4pdjS8MsZeZtwA/7dyxx+Hssb4kdOELFxLKTk6R7mn+8fhodaCWT+638z3ONfFAsObu vuTfVtH6gF4QsP+V+yjgAwxxvzO9H3Gd3dR58k7PhP9LQwYaFXv5uObw19RpGJAwFxxS L38+5OW5qJaY29kLxVrvTJd+1RL6pmLQXmVuesyCdFVjRyLMQi42W6vY9P0SPKoNwGIo FMtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3XcwgcWaigujwWYRekYo/qLw48E1xqkkdSQP+8yvu+GBiIJ7PAl606IaBSKDe1FA== X-Received: by 10.36.1.213 with SMTP id 204mr9876155itk.51.1491412238166; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (d27-96-48-76.nap.wideopenwest.com. [96.27.76.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x26sm10844109ioi.5.2017.04.05.10.10.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7e8b44e4-78e9-f9a8-63c1-0979bcecbb87@gmail.com> <2b672a97-dc43-492f-48d0-c1fabdb7d56c@gmail.com> <76251bb5-9303-6456-11b4-755032891880@gmail.com> <4e5dde61-633a-a8c1-d143-affb537f1e0c@gmail.com> <159206dc-84d4-e34b-9be3-3d57d682b68e@gmail.com> <9cda83a9-14b1-b997-4ee4-42cf1a602cce@gmail.com> <2aa7094b-6fbc-c981-c20a-4270c1d173bd@cygwin.com> From: cyg Simple Message-ID: Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2aa7094b-6fbc-c981-c20a-4270c1d173bd@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 On 4/4/2017 1:19 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-04-04 12:03, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 4/4/2017 9:04 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>> On 04/04/2017 14:43, cyg Simple wrote: >>>> >>>> Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require liblapack-devel >>>> and liblapack0. >>> >>> I disagree. It will not happen for my packages >> >> What's the hardship that causes you to make such a bold statement? You >> upload the same number of files, the only difference is telling setup >> that the package has dependencies. > > It's not a question of hardship, there is simply no need for it. > There is a need if I can choose the visible package and the default is binary install. > Marco, you can simply remove lapack from PKG_NAMES in order to hide it > in setup. > If it isn't visible in setup.exe then the issue disappears. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple