From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 85374 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2019 18:36:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 85367 invoked by uid 89); 25 Apr 2019 18:36:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*r:sk:mailout, H*RU:sk:mailout, HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:mailout, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mailout09.t-online.de Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (HELO mailout09.t-online.de) (194.25.134.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 18:36:24 +0000 Received: from fwd16.aul.t-online.de (fwd16.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.243]) by mailout09.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 52FE24229112 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.24] (XK3l4yZeohJi+uxDoN8X5W+1u4oGsagmXL+nY59PNQAExxmqTtTRPIy-Pk6a8o-Q-6@[87.154.32.156]) by fwd16.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1hJjEI-05fybI0; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:36:18 +0200 Subject: Re: bug: cygwin-devel v3.0.2-1 socket.h does not #define MSG_EOR per the POSIX standard To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <0873126E9D101A4A983DE738F4346DBC9114A8F3@NAWESPSCXM03V.nadsuswe.nads.navy.mil> <20190424164358.GG30041@calimero.vinschen.de> <4e01e86d-83c9-5855-c4a5-29f5375dc2dc@cs.umass.edu> <3a646fc6-82cb-1980-cc85-75cd4db6f3a0@SystematicSw.ab.ca> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 18:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 Am 25.04.2019 um 17:48 schrieb Eric Blake: > On 4/25/19 10:28 AM, Brian Inglis wrote: >> Would it be allowed and valid to #define MSG_EOR 0 to simplify lack of support? > > No, because that implies that EVERY send() call is requesting MSG_EOR > and that it never fails. And maybe more importantly, it's explicitly required to be non-zero. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple