Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-3

["Houder" <houder@xs4all.nl>]

> On Apr 14 17:26, Houder wrote:
>> >        Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
>> >
>> > The only reason I can think of is that the parent dir has default
>> > permissions which imply the mask value already.  So, what does
>> > `icacls . | cat' in this directory print?
>>
>> %% icacls . | cat
>> . NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)
>>   Seven\Test:(F)
>>   Seven\None:(RX)
>>   Everyone:(RX)
>>   NULL SID:(OI)(CI)(IO)(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)
>
> As I thought.  There's a mask value already in there which influences
> how the default permissions are inherited.  You created this dir with
> Cygwin 2.0 already, right?  Remove the masks with

You created this dir with Cygwin 2.0 already, right? Correct! I did not
occur to me to start all over again ...

>   $ setfacl -d m:,d:m: .
>
> and try again.
>
>>   CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(F)
>>   CREATOR GROUP:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
>>   Everyone:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
>
> This *should* work now.  I fear you have to remove the masks from
> all files and dirs created by Cygwin 2.0.  Sorry, but that's what
> testing is for ;}

No problem at all ...

Btw, I will only report back on this in case you are INcorrect above.

Henri


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple