From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout11.t-online.de (mailout11.t-online.de [194.25.134.85]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14F84385781D for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:26:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 14F84385781D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=t-online.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=t-online.de Received: from fwd72.dcpf.telekom.de (fwd72.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.98]) by mailout11.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 79CE2A453 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:26:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.26] ([87.154.45.36]) by fwd72.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1nkVKA-4U41FQ0; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:26:38 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:26:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: alternatives package dose not install /sbin executables Content-Language: en-US To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1651256798-0000B7AB-D00E1DE6/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: f97a7bc4-4f63-4020-b728-25d6e2913983 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:26:45 -0000 Am 29.04.2022 um 18:40 schrieb David Rogers via Cygwin: > I successfully installed: > alternatives 1.3.30c-10 OK > > According to the alternatives package file list I should have the following executables installed: alternatives.exe and update-alternatives.exe, Yes. But > I checked my /sbin directory not in that directory. If you examine the package listing once more, you'll find they're actually supposed to be in /usr/sbin.