From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com (mail-wm1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::344]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE9A3851C3C for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:58:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3CE9A3851C3C Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id q25so2831412wmj.0 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:58:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=u22DWwLlWBVX/I7wHsjdljRPFabltrISro3QCUMVOJw=; b=ebPT75FId/8CoDReJIflr5pKeeFR4wjIU8gZ/1fevI3SRMoX72R3tOU13oAQrE3Epa 7fUMLsZLm5Kw+/OuvV+Vk7qyyPJnAeMWFuMsIgkq3v2JtzjH/+78ullkB8HYliNYX8WN cSFOkAEfyF7v5RB6OwXjcwnxlSRexItm0gKqQbGbEilFhh9QVlEf49JSlXMGwzKsmiBN JkNdqu8WHMT8TVIYBShgpHvaBvi0Gp9Vp4ClgrBQiV4RQNqhKGb9ixCMz8sJ7tftta+1 F4bN8fO9SugsNMF4JDlVeWa6gAcjz8/QKR5Cti2tWTA0OrTi1eotKcsaZPu12XuDyTQq G1mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WnfFADBXff+bEI0tD17i1QdObBhewPNBo4sg/r4candgVR3R/ Y6XUDd/P4uEdRSNSRSfNu9v3b69xGQo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoi6aTsVi0BMLJY2xrXwxOfU56vHZe7PsXRqCsFPbS9PjEHPV9CqCrVyfAq8albeOiFtRNxA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4b0f:: with SMTP id y15mr4756555wma.83.1591815507477; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:cc:9f3b:4cdf:5df6:a5ee:7550:67ee? (p200300cc9f3b4cdf5df6a5ee755067ee.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cc:9f3b:4cdf:5df6:a5ee:7550:67ee]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm1027530wrb.72.2020.06.10.11.58.26 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: coreutils refresh request (again) To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" References: From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:58:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:58:30 -0000 On 10.06.2020 20:24, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: >> but it is missing the patch used to adapt it to Cygwin. >> The patch modifies 27 files and unfortunately does not applies >> clean to latest upstream source. > > Fair enough (and again, there was no pushing); but are you sure that all 27 patches are still actual? > > Testsuite ran pretty well, though. I looked as some failures (not all), and they looked rather benign. > > ============================================================================ > Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.32 > ============================================================================ > # TOTAL: 621 > # PASS: 413 > # SKIP: 167 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 33 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 8 > >> The are at lest 3 points that need rewriting > > Okay; maybe those should be reported upstream, as Cygwin is largely standard-compliant these days? > the testsuite is not relevant for these changes. Coreutils are tweaked to manage "program" and "program.exe" as they are the same thing and other similar things. Some changes were propagated upstream and some not; I looked at the first patch rejected, and upstream have reversed the logic of a test that the patch was modifying to add one of these cases, so modifying the source is not banal and need some consideration and test. Both requires time that someone need to put for it. Regards Marco