From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 50301 invoked by alias); 19 May 2017 22:10:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 50283 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2017 22:10:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=networking X-HELO: mail-wm0-f65.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f65.google.com) (74.125.82.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2017 22:10:26 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id b84so4752963wmh.0 for ; Fri, 19 May 2017 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rnv5vam1YYK2HEKxolUKMz61144Y3EZLLhAznyYAE5w=; b=ldSK6H4LcCsjwJdCjnc9L94bnJzen+lRCto45f3ZjZwmLLSn1mQ86M+3dU64rbwlh4 7xvUGVpARlP+DNlTcwIdiHgYRM99Ns1/VeLqZ8TzC8ur8KVMuBohwJ1x4rBJVuQCWRU2 pIGvvLsPujAmfmxarV2tct2UE99lEn9m+fbnLghqugxfvvC+zq6cdMIuTy7JEeRaXzhb 3/YlKS2YdFclarjMEFLR8+Tr82FZOAnqeCA/Qp4c4Y1CDB6Gr70iKp8euINotEQ8u+M3 Lu41ZNbxVXw2kZRmnv1Ce+x6MK6bc6MrVahOxtLq1ukcan4/S9Xu2HwmHHGqd97fYyf3 t9pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAdMiqvjTGgvFAGYZ0nW2uTfOcKQDb+6tS1ByDHMLQS6JH9AgdZ Yf+Ct2iSyjIyJZjEsBM= X-Received: by 10.28.185.200 with SMTP id j191mr20462511wmf.48.1495231826958; Fri, 19 May 2017 15:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (79-67-178-202.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [79.67.178.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f70sm16130051wmd.25.2017.05.19.15.10.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 May 2017 15:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 5 seconds to update link info? From: Richard H Lee To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <9810467454.20170520003732@yandex.ru> <8a4d9976-372e-a21c-676a-59cf7f2ebba6@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:50:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8a4d9976-372e-a21c-676a-59cf7f2ebba6@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 On 19/05/2017 23:01, Richard H Lee wrote: > On 19/05/2017 22:37, Andrey Repin wrote: >> When executed this oneliner over Samba 4.3 network share, it takes 5 >> seconds to match the newly created hardlink. I'm wondering if this is >> Cygwin, Samba or Windows networking issue? > > I think it's something to do with windows name resolution. > > Try running: > ls // > > You should see a similar delay. I forgot to mention that you can get rid of this delay by disabling NetBIOS on your active network connection(s). I don't think this should interfere with the operation of Samba. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple