From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47515 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2016 19:36:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 47503 invoked by uid 89); 16 Feb 2016 19:36:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=disadvantage, waterlan!, H*i:sk:7737704, H*f:sk:7737704 X-HELO: lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (HELO lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net) (194.109.24.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:36:17 +0000 Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.217]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id K7cC1s00Q4h15BW017cChf; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:36:12 +0100 Received: from 2001:981:e138:1:353f:5996:f145:d450 by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:36:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:36:00 -0000 From: waterlan To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] dosbox 0.74-2 In-Reply-To: <773770423.20160216204742@yandex.ru> References: <56C229DA.9060700@xs4all.nl> <56C2311D.404@cygwin.com> <56C26740.7000802@cygwin.com> <773770423.20160216204742@yandex.ru> Message-ID: X-Sender: waterlan@xs4all.nl (jvg2NzuPlKIuwhQ+/vE38TENUytLk2Ny) User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 Andrey Repin schreef op 2016-02-16 18:47: > Greetings, waterlan! > >>>> I run DosBOX-win32 directly on 64 bit Windows. No need for a Cygwin >>>> POSIX layer here. >>> >>> You could say the same of many packages. If you want to run MinGW or >>> MSYS, go right ahead. If you want to use Cygwin as an environment in >>> and of its own, then the more packages therein the better. > >> I agree with you, but I can't see the advantage for DosBOX. > > I don't see a disadvantage either. So, what was your problem, again? > It is not like anyone forcing you to install it, right? I don't have a problem with it. I was only wondering if anyone would use it. -- Erwin -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple