From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8314 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2008 21:27:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 8304 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2008 21:27:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:26:51 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K6BMX-0001tc-W8 for cygwin@cygwin.com; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:26:42 +0000 Received: from 189.146.59.117 ([189.146.59.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:26:41 +0000 Received: from r.berber by 189.146.59.117 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:26:41 +0000 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Berber?= Subject: Re: Cygwin DNS lookup utility Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <484C134C.3000903@free.fr> <17761040.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080610191348.GB902@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <17762732.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: <17762732.post@talk.nabble.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 jtriedl wrote: > LOL. I should have mentioned that I checked all the obvious permission > things, and they're all what one would expect: >=20 > (riedl-ibm-x40: /) ll /usr/bin/nslookup.exe > 60K -rwxr-xr-x 1 riedl Users 60K Jun 10 10:23 /usr/bin/nslookup.exe* > (riedl-ibm-x40: /) ll /usr/bin/dig.exe > 72K -rwxr-xr-x 1 riedl Users 72K Jun 10 10:23 /usr/bin/dig.exe* > (riedl-ibm-x40: /) >=20 > I was speculating that the permission was some windows restriction on > sending low-level name service requests, but I was hoping someone on this > list would know more. ISC's BIND works fine out of the box (no "instructions" followed). No=20 real answer to your question, my guess is that you did something wrong=20 (like follow "instructions" for a Microsoft compiler or build in a weird=20 file system, not NTFS, perhaps a network share or NFS mounted with no=20 execute permission). $ tar xvf bind-9.5.0.tar.gz $ cd bind-9.5.0 $ ./configure --enable-threads --with-openssl=3Dyes --with-libtool $ make $ make install $ which dig /usr/local/bin/dig $ dig smbserver ; <<>> DiG 9.5.0 <<>> smbserver ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 52334 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;smbserver. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: . 8267 IN SOA A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.=20 NSTLD.VERISIGN-GRS.COM. 2008061000 1800 900 604800 86400 ;; Query time: 9 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 10 16:25:37 2008 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 102 --=20 Ren=E9 Berber -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/