From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12759 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2011 17:37:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 12736 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Aug 2011 17:37:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_RX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:36:43 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qwdr2-0001jN-TB for cygwin@cygwin.com; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:36:36 +0200 Received: from 173-164-195-49-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.164.195.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:36:36 +0200 Received: from Andrew.DeFaria by 173-164-195-49-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:36:36 +0200 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <1314198447.17029.140258133233741@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1314201141.31858.140258133254297@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1314258833.16582.140258133526109@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: <1314258833.16582.140258133526109@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Stationery: 0.7.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00476.txt.bz2 On 8/25/2011 12:53 AM, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:03 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria" > wrote: >> On 08/24/11 08:52, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: >>> Yep, though right now I'm fancying zsh. >> Where it makes sense, it's always good to go with what a lot of people >> go with. How many Solaris machines have zsh installed? > All of them I've seen so far ;-) > > Of course I am aware that there are also plenty Solaris hosts out there > where the admin hasn't bother to install it. The question is whether or not it is installed by default. Many shops only install defaults. Often getting something non-default is like pulling teeth. -- Andrew DeFaria Why is bra singular and panties plural? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple