From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19454 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2012 17:43:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 19445 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2012 17:43:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from plane.gmane.org (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:43:31 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SiUMo-0007Fs-6j for cygwin@cygwin.com; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:26 +0200 Received: from fixed-203-69-28.iusacell.net ([189.203.69.28]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:26 +0200 Received: from r.berber by fixed-203-69-28.iusacell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:26 +0200 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Berber?= Subject: Re: cygwin port forwarding Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <1340468946.24539.26.camel@corn.betterworld.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 In-Reply-To: <1340468946.24539.26.camel@corn.betterworld.us> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2 On 6/23/2012 11:29 AM, Ross Boylan wrote: > Can non-cygwin applications "see" the ports ssh in cygwin sets up for > forwarding? I did some tests on Windows 7 and found that, although the > forwarding was clearly in effect for commands I ran in the cygwin shell, > it did not seem to be accessible to the regular Windows version of > Thunderbird. Yes. I use a tunnel from home to work, and by use I mean Firefox to open pages/applications I don't want to expose to the Internet. It should be the same with Thunderbird, of course the port changes, but you connect to localhost:143 (IMAP), localhost:25 (SMTP), or whatever. If you can connect with telnet to those ports, then TBird shouldn't have a problem. -- René Berber -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple