From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23669 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2013 09:30:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 23655 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jun 2013 09:30:08 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_AV autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from plane.gmane.org (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:30:07 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpxfO-0007Bp-LE for cygwin@cygwin.com; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:30:02 +0200 Received: from nat-invites.saclay.inria.fr ([195.83.213.140]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:30:02 +0200 Received: from jpflori by nat-invites.saclay.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:30:02 +0200 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Jean-Pierre Flori Subject: Re: Broken MPIR 2.6.0 on Cygwin64 Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20130621083039.GH1620@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00552.txt.bz2 Hey, Thanks for the quick reply. Le Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:30:39 +0200, Corinna Vinschen a écrit : >> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -O2 >> -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx -o t-bswap.exe t-bswap.o > > Uhm, are you sure this arch and tune options aren't the problem here? This is automatically determined by the configure script, I get the same for GMP, it actually corresponds to my CPU, and works fine on Linux. Anyway, I've also tried with only "-m64 -O0 -g" and got similar results. > > Is building the binutils package yourself and without optimization, but > with all debug symbols available an option for you? This should help to > track down the problem. > It's an option. I'll try to do that today. Best, JP -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple