From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31759 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2014 11:26:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 31748 invoked by uid 89); 7 Apr 2014 11:26:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org Received: from plane.gmane.org (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 11:26:42 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WX7hG-0006I2-Sw for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:26:38 +0200 Received: from cer78-1-88-174-56-78.fbx.proxad.net ([88.174.56.78]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:26:38 +0200 Received: from jpflori by cer78-1-88-174-56-78.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:26:38 +0200 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Jean-Pierre Flori Subject: Re: Possibly wrong address passed to callq asm instruction within MPIR test binaries Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 11:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20140402090750.GP2508@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140407084312.GA2061@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 Le Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:43:30 +0000, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit : >> >> Note in particular the __nm_ prefix. >> It is as advertiserd here: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-01/ >> msg00236.html But when looking at the Cygwin32 produced import lib, I >> don't see any nm prefix. > > In fact, I see some... but for much fewer functions, strange. I have troubles understanding when this _nm_ prefix actually gets added, any help welcome :) Is there any dark magic related to inlining? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple