From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32235 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2011 17:56:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 32224 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2011 17:56:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:56:30 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMO0C-0003Ls-Rj for cygwin@cygwin.com; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:56:29 +0100 Received: from 76-217-4-67.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net ([76.217.4.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:56:28 +0100 Received: from mark by 76-217-4-67.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:56:28 +0100 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Mark Geisert Subject: Re: Problem with execution of binary file Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <1320322806.5480.161.camel@kare-desktop> <4EB30E21.3090707@cs.umass.edu> <1320396611.5480.196.camel@kare-desktop> <4EB3C378.6060308@cs.umass.edu> <1320409986.5480.219.camel@kare-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 > Anyway, I've installed two versions of cygwin on the same machine - the > first was installed around Oct. 3 and the second one from a few days > ago. Compiling exactly the same software on both versions gives success > on the older installation and failure on the newer one. Could it be that [...] > Do you have any immediate idea of what could be the potential problem? Only immediate suggestions :). Run 'objdump -fp' on the two executables. Perhaps there's a difference between outputs that stands out or is meaningful to somebody on the list when you report it. Another thing you might try is 'cygcheck -svr' on the two Cygwin versions and compare output. That may show meaningful differences between the two versions. That will have a lot of output to sift through but any differences listed may point to something. ..mark -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple