From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8857 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2014 23:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 8844 invoked by uid 89); 13 Nov 2014 23:45:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org Received: from plane.gmane.org (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:45:10 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp44W-00034R-1k for cygwin@cygwin.com; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:45:04 +0100 Received: from 77.28.102.182 ([77.28.102.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:45:04 +0100 Received: from ivan by 77.28.102.182 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:45:04 +0100 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Ivan Todoroski Subject: Re: Notable performance improvement in 64-bit build Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 Csaba Raduly writes: > Do you have the same .profile in both installations? Yes, the two installations are actually sharing the same home dir, I have both of them configured to use HOME=%USERPROFILE%. > Do you have the same bash-completion package (often the most > time-consuming part of bash startup)? I don't have the "bash-completion" package installed at all, neither in the 32-bit nor 64-bit installs. I just double checked this now. Also, I didn't mention this in the original mail, but to make sure I was comparing apples to apples I actually put "set -x" at the top of the .profile script, then I ran it under the 32-bit and 64-bit installs and compared the outputs using "diff", to make sure the exact sequence of steps was executed in both cases. Of course I removed the "set -x" for the actual benchmark measurements. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple