From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63459 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2016 10:59:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 63446 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2016 10:59:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:CAOYw7d, she, tonight X-HELO: plane.gmane.org Received: from plane.gmane.org (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:59:58 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQCD3-0001jJ-6V for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:59:53 +0100 Received: from a83-162-234-136.adsl.xs4all.nl ([83.162.234.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:59:53 +0100 Received: from houder by a83-162-234-136.adsl.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:59:53 +0100 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Henri Subject: Re: =?utf-8?b?Y3lnd2luX2NvbnZfcGF0aA==?= sometimes removes trailing slash Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <56AC2C35.9060903@cornell.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Ray Donnelly gmail.com> writes: > I can't check as I'm at work, but to the best of my knowledge (and yes > I wrote these a long time ago) path_conv::check is used in conversions > both ways so I am talking about both cases here, Jan's with the first > patch and Ken's with the second patch. Please do correct me if I am > wrong though! I will run some detailed tests tonight. As I wrote to Ken (private e-mail), let us wait for Corinna: she knows all the nooks and crannies here ... As far as I can tell, path_conv::check() is invoked for posix -> win32 only; that is, in cygwin_conv_path() (winsup/cygwin/path.cc). But, again, let us wait for Corinna. Regards, Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple