From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20733 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2016 08:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 20724 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2016 08:07:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:746, H*Ad:U*tony X-HELO: plane.gmane.org Received: from plane.gmane.org (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:07:16 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1agSxc-0001US-B3 for cygwin@cygwin.com; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:07:12 +0100 Received: from 66-87-119-116.pools.spcsdns.net ([66.87.119.116]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:07:12 +0100 Received: from tony by 66-87-119-116.pools.spcsdns.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:07:12 +0100 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Tony Kelman Subject: Re: =?utf-8?b?bWluZ3c2NC0qLXtoZWFkZXJzLHJ1bnRpbWUsd2lucHRocmVhZHN9LTQuMC41LTE=?= =?utf-8?b?KHg4Ni94ODZfNjQp?= Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 Tony Kelman kelman.net> writes: > > > I have just updated the mingw-w64 headers, runtime, and winpthreads to > > 4.0.5-1. > > > > mingw64-*-headers-4.0.5-1 > > mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1 > > mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1 > > Question, since I just had issues building some of LLVM's unit tests and > tracked the root cause back to here - is it intentional that x86_64-headers > gets built with --enable-secure-api but i686-headers doesn't? Week later, hopefully socially acceptable ping. Can I request that mingw64-i686-headers get rebuilt with --enable-secure-api at the next update? Is there an especially good reason not to have it enabled by default? Thanks, Tony -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple