From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
To: Markus Hoenicka <Markus.Hoenicka@uth.tmc.edu>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 08:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3n11n3add.fsf@appel.lilypond.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15348.5126.44000.631380@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Markus Hoenicka's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:14:14 +0000")
Markus Hoenicka <Markus.Hoenicka@uth.tmc.edu> writes:
> Did you install the teTeX texmf tree? Just installing Tetex-beta is
> not enough, as explained by the Tetex-beta readme.
This is exacly why I asked if there was any chance if this would get
fixed (.. is not enough), or if tetex-beta would be removed or marked
experimental again with this lifted package moratorium new strictness.
It would be Very Good (TM), if installing a package (and its
dependencies, eg, tetex-texmf) would be `enough' for the package to
work. This is what Debian and Red Hat packages do, usually.
Having a broken package that doesn't get fixed by it's maintainer is
arguably worse than having none at all. Maybe Cygwin should introduce
something like Debian's Non-maintainer uploads to address this problem?
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-15 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-02 12:06 no more package moratorium? Gareth Pearce
2001-11-02 12:19 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Corinna Vinschen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
[not found] ` <m3k7wr50fa.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
2001-11-11 8:26 ` tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?] Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen [this message]
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Charles Wilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jerome BENOIT
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` no more package moratorium? Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Jesper Eskilson
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Stipe Tolj
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Gareth Pearce
2001-11-11 8:26 tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?] Robinow, David
2001-11-11 8:26 Gary R Van Sickle
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Robert Collins
2001-11-11 8:26 Gary R Van Sickle
2001-11-11 8:26 ` Markus Hoenicka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3n11n3add.fsf@appel.lilypond.org \
--to=janneke@gnu.org \
--cc=Markus.Hoenicka@uth.tmc.edu \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).