From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16784 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2013 23:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 16758 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jul 2013 23:46:27 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 23:46:26 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V13KP-0000Aw-8D for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:46:13 +0200 Received: from 99.156.150.203 ([99.156.150.203]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:46:13 +0200 Received: from schulman.andrew by 99.156.150.203 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:46:13 +0200 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix optional variables in libargp Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <000001ce7e08$2b866830$82933890$%fedin@samsung.com> <4q4ut8had25hqmo8b0752i8asuv6ism2qh@4ax.com> <002901ce7f0a$9da99420$d8fcbc60$%fedin@samsung.com> <002601ce82b7$63229580$2967c080$%fedin@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2 > I have tested the implementation on x86-64 with RedHat's Prelink utility, > and it works quite fine. i386 should work too, but please retest, just in > case. Fedin, thanks for sending this. I've tested it for x86_64, and it works there. However in x86, in my testing I can't get it to work. I tried removing the PREFIX function, and after that it did work once, but I've tried it again several times and now I can't reproduce that. So at this point your patch doesn't work in x86 for me. I'd appreciate it if someone else could test it, or suggest a modification to make it work. Andrew -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple