From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107529 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2015 20:34:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 107507 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2015 20:34:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailout.ish.de Received: from mailout.ish.de (HELO mailout.ish.de) (80.69.98.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:34:04 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -1.426 Received: from submit.unitybox.de (mailout.ish.de [80.69.98.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.ish.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3n2G485t8wz6BWVX for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:34:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submit.unitybox.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3n2G482yKrz7t9f for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from submit.unitybox.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (submit.unitybox.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id YctkVg5zJjxu for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nebbiolo.upc.de (ip-178-203-85-128.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de [178.203.85.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submit.unitybox.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3n2G481LMpz7t9X for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Updated [test]: coreutils-8.24-2 References: <001c01d0e04c$d8ebc210$8ac34630$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <000001d0e051$965f38a0$c31da9e0$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <55DE4B8B.6000401@redhat.com> <55DF6961.9040804@dwalin.fsnet.co.uk> <55DF7265.8050607@lysator.liu.se> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 21:40:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Helmut Karlowski" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <55DF7265.8050607@lysator.liu.se> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2 Am 27.08.2015, 21:26 Uhr, schrieb Peter Rosin: > Seems like a fast way to not get a compiler warning if you do happen > to use a variable that would be used uninitialized if it were not for > an ugly pointless initializer. > Sorry if I added the wrong number of negations in there, but you get my > point anyway, hopefully... Did you mean: "The compiler-warning would inform you that the value is not set in a code-path"? That's why I usually try to avoid initializing auto-variables (and maybe save some bytes). -Helmut -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple