From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-return-44935-listarch-cygwin=sourceware.cygnus.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 12248 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2002 20:17:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Received: (qmail 12060 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2002 20:17:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail50.fg.online.no) (148.122.161.50)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2002 20:17:27 -0000
Received: from FENRIS (ti100720a001-0143.dialup.online.no [130.67.133.143])
	by mail50.fg.online.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06038;
	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:16:59 +0100 (MET)
To: "David Gluss" <dgluss@marple-tech.com>
Cc: <cygwin@cygwin.com>, "Peter J. Acklam" <pjacklam@online.no>
Subject: Re: /usr/bin/env - Incorrect parsing of #! line?
References: <8z9y4kbm.fsf@online.no> <001b01c1b3ff$46981950$6600a8c0@cherry>
Organization: Private
From: pjacklam@online.no (Peter J. Acklam)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:17:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <001b01c1b3ff$46981950$6600a8c0@cherry> ("David Gluss"'s
 message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:55:47 -0800")
Message-ID: <r8nq319x.fsf@online.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1
 (i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2

"David Gluss" <dgluss@marple-tech.com> wrote:

> I don't know if it's constructive to suggest an alternative trick, rather
> than trying to fix cygwin, in this forum.  However, this might work
> for you:
>>------------
>>: # -*-Mode: perl;-*- use perl, wherever it is
>>eval 'exec perl -wS $0 ${1+"$@"}'
>>  if 0;
>>#!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
>>------------

Thanks!  But I wonder, does the colon really belong there?  If so,
what does it do?  Will this work under all common shells (sh, ksh,
bash, zsh, csh, tcsh)?

I hasitate to use a script with no shebang line, because I'm so
used to it always being present in a script, but if I don't really
need it, then I guess I can do without.

Peter

-- 
People say I'm indifferent, but I don't care.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/