From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vmicros1.altlinux.org (vmicros1.altlinux.org [194.107.17.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316703858002 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:00:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 316703858002 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=altlinux.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ldv@altlinux.org Received: from mua.local.altlinux.org (mua.local.altlinux.org [192.168.1.14]) by vmicros1.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BD772C8C5; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:00:56 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mua.local.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 508) id C88407CC8A3; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:00:55 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:00:55 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: Mark Wielaard Cc: rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org, debugedit@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] debugedit project setup Message-ID: <20210329110055.GC11628@altlinux.org> References: <7bdd564bae323bf300ddeba40cba5313e3eaa22d.camel@klomp.org> <5c1d49ba-5a01-e6b2-dbc7-3cd64d552688@redhat.com> <20210325211338.GI2685@wildebeest.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210325211338.GI2685@wildebeest.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: debugedit@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: debugedit development mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:00:58 -0000 Hi Mark, On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:13:38PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Panu, > > I added debugedit@sourceware.org to the CC. > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:52:53PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 3/23/21 2:29 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > On 3/22/21 7:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > There is a test debugedit-0.1 release to see whether this works. But I > > > > would like to make sure first that things are setup so that flatpak and > > > > rpm can use this as is before people start packaging it. Once we know > > > > it can be used as replacement for the built-in rpm/flatpak debugedit we > > > > do a proper debugedit 1.0 release. > > > > > > Awesome. I'll make it a priority to see that we transition, if at all > > > possible, to the external debugedit in rpm 4.17 already. Stay tuned... > > > > FWIW, here's a quick-n-dirty package of debugedit 0.1: > > > > https://laiskiainen.org/rpm/debugedit/ > > Nice, thanks. Would it make sense to add the debugedit.spec to the > debugedit sources themselves so people can easily create an rpm? > > Does it actually make sense to install everything under bindir? At least debugedit executable has a documented command line interface, so I'd say it belongs to bindir. -- ldv