From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB923855024 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 10:41:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1BB923855024 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (83-87-18-245.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.87.18.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14BA03000346; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 12:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C74A8413CE02; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 12:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20ae4642bc4e36eb705db1162ab61092c50f372d.camel@klomp.org> Subject: Re: Please raise version number above RPM releases From: Mark Wielaard To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= , debugedit@sourceware.org Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:41:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <637b2cb2b30cd08b8ec88aaed28c7539c5efda35.camel@gentoo.org> References: <2b049bab787602c9bb5a42c9b39187a78ffbc241.camel@gentoo.org> <4aa74641b51259fdf123c4b95fb9626af8830d14.camel@klomp.org> <637b2cb2b30cd08b8ec88aaed28c7539c5efda35.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: debugedit@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: debugedit development mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 10:41:13 -0000 Hi Micha=C5=82, On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 12:39 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > I suppose Gentoo will wait for that happen before switching over > then. Forgot to ask, but does gentoo have any patches that could/should be upstreamed? Thanks, Mark