From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
To: debugedit@sourceware.org, rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org,
Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@sourceware.org>,
christian.morales.vega@gmail.com,
Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>,
Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] debugedit project setup
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:37:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526dccc0-70bc-2bf9-f288-90e64274259c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbeba40d-cb68-113c-2db7-9789e27426c5@redhat.com>
On 3/23/21 2:29 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 3/22/21 7:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As discussed I setup a separate debugedit project:
>> https://sourceware.org/debugedit/
>>
>> It contains the debugedit and sepdebugcrcfix programs and the find-
>> debuginfo.sh script and the debugedit.at testsuite. I used git-filter-
>> repo to keep the git history of the files from the rpm repo. Then I
>> resynced the libiberty and binutils files and added a minimal
>> automake/autoconf/autotest build system. Replace popt with getopt
>> argument parsing. And use libiberty md5 or sha1 instead of rpmDigest
>> algorithms for build-id updates.
>>
>> There is a test debugedit-0.1 release to see whether this works. But I
>> would like to make sure first that things are setup so that flatpak and
>> rpm can use this as is before people start packaging it. Once we know
>> it can be used as replacement for the built-in rpm/flatpak debugedit we
>> do a proper debugedit 1.0 release.
>
> Awesome. I'll make it a priority to see that we transition, if at all
> possible, to the external debugedit in rpm 4.17 already. Stay tuned...
Here goes:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1712
- Panu -
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 17:42 Mark Wielaard
2021-03-23 12:29 ` [Rpm-ecosystem] " Panu Matilainen
[not found] ` <5c1d49ba-5a01-e6b2-dbc7-3cd64d552688@redhat.com>
2021-03-25 21:13 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-03-26 1:11 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-03-29 8:21 ` Panu Matilainen
2021-03-29 8:31 ` Panu Matilainen
2021-03-29 11:00 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2021-06-18 8:37 ` Panu Matilainen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526dccc0-70bc-2bf9-f288-90e64274259c@redhat.com \
--to=pmatilai@redhat.com \
--cc=alexl@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.morales.vega@gmail.com \
--cc=debugedit@sourceware.org \
--cc=doko@debian.org \
--cc=ldv@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).