From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D43853864877; Thu, 6 May 2021 00:33:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D43853864877 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1620261217; bh=fCYdXbmCwQt04atkLNleLjAAq8WdizGKWiuBbNedXmM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MvPmibuEs3b7m95lMDL6lsUn14bxxX2+jdraGzypyhRFGN8f+I0ZECYC/kvx7aHNB IqFKRLlAGbKIpLmbuEewjxvz2Edbn2U+oo1CSOnrnGi0dZzk9fpLRkVHSVWu0tRaKg iNJhpUzWjxtpdmjDGhPOArJBstlngYAsA890olTw= From: "mark at klomp dot org" To: debugedit@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug find-debuginfo.sh/27640] find-debuginfo.sh or find-debuginfo? Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 00:33:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: debugedit X-Bugzilla-Component: find-debuginfo.sh X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mark at klomp dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: debugedit@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: debugedit development mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 00:33:37 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D27640 Mark Wielaard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mark at klomp dot org, | |pmatilai at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard --- It would be nice to rename it to simply find-debuginfo. But this might have some backwards compatibility issues for rpm and old spec files which might = rely on the exact name. This might not be too strong an objection to renaming it though. Up till now this was an internal detail of rpm. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=