From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10230 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2011 08:48:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 10220 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2011 08:48:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:48:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0Q8mk1N003278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:48:46 -0500 Received: from [10.34.25.213] (dhcp-25-213.brq.redhat.com [10.34.25.213]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0Q8miLY003036; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:48:45 -0500 Subject: Re: COPYING file is just a symlink in sgml-common-0.6.3.tgz From: Ondrej Vasik Reply-To: ovasik@redhat.com To: Eric Bischoff Cc: Scott Garman , docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <6ECAD079-F17D-4735-B59C-F33E4B6F8019@nerim.net> References: <4D3E166D.5030905@intel.com> <82107414-5894-401F-95D7-0DD95F8A4093@nerim.net> <1295970849.6315.4.camel@dhcp-24-233.brq.redhat.com> <6ECAD079-F17D-4735-B59C-F33E4B6F8019@nerim.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1296031824.6315.19.camel@dhcp-24-233.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact docbook-tools-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: docbook-tools-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 Eric Bischoff wrote: > > I'll arrange new sgml-common project pages on fedorahosted.org (this or > > next week) ... > > > 1) What about the docbook-utils project ? > > it was a part of docbook-tools . Perhaps it was too ambitious to put everything under the roof of the docbook-tools. But I keep receiving some feedback about the docbook-utils scripts. I could request hosting for docbook-utils as well ... there are some patches in Fedora which could be merged with yours and we could make new release... > 2) Ovasik, if you're at redhat, could you possibly retrieve my old password at docbook-tools project? I would prefer moving it to fedorahosted - we could have ticketing trac instance there and it is "more open" - you only need Fedora account and it is easy to get one. Greetings, Ondrej Vasik