From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Mason To: Norman Walsh Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: was something else - now SGML and XML Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 Message-id: <200002231643.LAA22211@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00079.html < 200002231540.KAA08528@devserv.devel.redhat.com > < 7453-Wed23Feb2000110215-0500-ndw@nwalsh.com > X-URL: < http://www.redhat.com > From: "David C. Mason" Date: 23 Feb 2000 11:43:04 -0500 Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Norman Walsh writes: > If you're referring to IE5 support for XSL, it's so badly broken > that it's just about useless. (Worse than useless, in fact.) Is that true - I, obviously, don't use IE but I see a lot of traffic on the DocBook lists from people who do and despite the fact that they are usually trying to work around some problem - there sure seems to be a lot of people using it. Is that true or am I trapped in a good marketing scheme? Dave